Prepared by: Meshaal Sulaiman Alrubaysh Law Firm & Legal Consultancy
Professional Profile: Meshaal Sulaiman Alrubaysh
Sources Last Checked:

Illustrative image
A report of lateness or missing equipment can lead to a sanction before the facts become clear, making investigation quality part of management quality. An organized record helps explain what happened, preserves the employee’s opportunity to respond and enables the company to justify its decision through evidence and procedure rather than an initial impression or a general allegation.
Describe the incident before labeling it
Record the alleged act, its date and the relevant instruction or obligation, distinguishing complaint, evidence and finding. Asking why someone was negligent assumes the conclusion. Questions about how the task was performed and available documents help identify the cause. Collect system logs and correspondence and identify actual witnesses before interviewing the employee.
Hear and examine the response
Article 71 of the Saudi Labor Law requires safeguards before disciplinary sanctions, including written notification of the allegation, questioning, examination of the defense and a record in the employee’s file. Oral questioning is permitted for minor violations whose sanction does not exceed a warning or a fine deducted at no more than one day’s wages, and it must still be recorded. In practice, document questions, answers, attachments and verification requests, allowing the employee to explain circumstances and correct allegations.
Connect the decision to proven facts
The cause may be an individual error, insufficient training or overlapping authority. The decision should identify established facts, evidence and the legal or policy basis for the sanction, respecting permitted sanctions and procedural time limits. Articles 69 and 72 contain important deadlines for allegations, sanctions and challenges. Review them against actual dates and notifications and track the case actively.
Distinguish discipline from termination
Employment termination is not always disciplinary, and an investigation record alone does not validate dismissal without end-of-service benefits, notice or compensation. Article 80 has specific conditions and requires an opportunity to oppose termination. Expiry of a fixed term and termination of an indefinite contract have separate rules. Choose the route matching the facts.
Keep a reviewable file
Restrict access to the final record, evidence, notification and decision. Record any refusal to sign accurately without inventing an admission. A signature does not replace examination of the contents. The investigator’s recommendation should remain reviewable by the authorized decision maker. Confidential, respectful handling prevents allegations circulating within the business.
- Specific incident and preserved original evidence
- Employee’s defense and verification results
- Reasoned decision, notification and tracked deadlines
Fictional example
A delayed order was attributed to a warehouse employee. System logs showed that release approval arrived after the delivery deadline. Hearing the employee and tracing approvals shifted the response toward improving the process and defining responsibilities. In any case, the decision remains dependent on established facts.
Review the incident, procedure and legal basis together before imposing a sanction. A sound record supports responsible decisions and both parties’ rights, with treatment depending on the contract, work rules and individual circumstances.
Official Sources
General educational content, not a substitute for advice on your facts and documents, and not a guarantee of any outcome.
Translations refer to Saudi law, consult the official legal text when applying it.
Turn knowledge into a considered decision, discuss your needs with our team.
Request a legal review

